Are security measures for air passengers too strict?

Yes, yes and yes. I travel international flights every month and I am always amazed how quick t0 go through most security in Euro nations vs U.S.

The other big problem is different U.S. airports have different rules for what need

is to be placed in carts.

I believe the TSA tries but is basically a jobs program.

As is typical, the U.S. overreacts to everything.

“Strict” is a relative term. It’s the inconsistency that is frustrating. Haphazard staffing levels add to the frustration when the passenger line goes on and on and lanes that could be open, aren’t.

I’ve had cases at MSP where the delay was significant enough that TSA agents were combing the long lines seeking passengers for certain departing flights that were stuck in line. Those folks got pulled from the line and ushered to the front, justifiably.

If I were one of them, I would be grateful. But please TSA, look at your staffing levels.

Yes, but Americans have always been reluctant to admit that good ideas might come from Europe, bad European ideas notwithstanding, so it’s not likely to change. We’re too unwilling to let go of our arrogance and learn from other countries’ successes. (Consider, for instance, our allergic reaction to anything vaguely resembling socialized medicine.)

Yes. When it comes to making air travel inconvenient, the terrorists won. But that might not be a bad thing for our country. It is making more fuel efficient rail travel an attractive option for shorter trips.

No! Are they reactionary as opposed to proactive? Yes. That doesn’t mean they are too strict. These are a response to actual attempts. If the rules didn’t change, terrorists would have simply tried again until it did. Remember, 9/11 was not the first WTC attck. They just found a way to do it more successfully.

Second, I find it amusing that Europeans are telling us anything about security. People are actually listening when they have had many times more terrorist attacks (although smaller scale than 9/11) than we ever have on our soil? Give me a break. This is like the UN telling the US what to do after the fact in the Balkans when they were too cowardly or weak to do the right thing (ending genocide is the right thing afterall) themselves.

Strick, schmrict.

Security expert Bruce Schneir’s term “security theater” is spot on.

Whatever the case, the issue for me is TSA inconsistency.

My my light sit is just too discretionary. I can carry the same camera bag thorugh MSP and other airports again and again — always with the same contents — and its always a crapshoot as to whether it will be pulled aside for individual inspection.

Furthermore, Its been a few years since I kast found an official

TSA notification in my checked baggage — this was once much more common… Have these standards been eased?

Doesn’t anyone but me pay attention to the news? I distinctly remember hearing that the “inconsistency” in what TSA screens for is deliberate. Rather than screen for absolutely everything every time, they change the criteria randomly around the country to keep the terrorists guessing. There are plenty of legitimate complaints one might level against TSA, but inconsistency is not one of them.

Too strict? Hardly! US airline “security” is nothing more than an amalgam of theater and public relations. You want real airline security, think El Al the Israeli Airline. El Al doesn’t recognize political correctness, rather they interview airline passengers before they get on the plane. We call this “racial profiling”, which will be our undoing. In case you haven’t noticed, not all Moslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Moslims.

I recently flew to Atlanta and a TSA agent swabbed my hands supposedly to detect explosive residue. OK fine, whatever…. but what about the guy behind me or the one in front? To me, to have the palms of my hands swabbed gave me NO greater sense of security, instead I perceived it as a process no more restrictive than having my boarding pass scanned at the gate.

The problem I have is that why the TSA agent picked me out. Not that I’m “offended” heaven forbid, but if I am subject to additional scrutiny then so should everybody else be also? If swabbing the hands of passengers is a security measure available to TSA then why not use it for everyone? I guess this is a matter of politically correct random sampling. Maybe it was my long hair or graying beard that prompted the TSA agent to give me a second look. I wonder, would he have done the same if I was wearing Islamic clothing?

I am waiting for the next Islamic-derived airline act of terrorism, (presuming they are smart enough to actually pull it off), to occur which will prove the US airline security structure to be an abject failure. Thus will be exposed this feel-good public relations charade of so called airplane “security” we’ve had to put up with since 9/11.

Hopefully I won’t be flying to Atlanta when that happens.

Let’s say, “Obnoxious, and not helpful”.

Traveling by air for the first time in a few years, I recently forgot about some new super-secure policies and had to talk to security about my carry-on luggage. The reason? I had a few ounces too many of toothpaste.

Toothpaste? Really? Let’s think about this. If I’m not a terrorist, you’ve just made it harder for me to brush my teeth. (This is the most common scenario.) If I am a terrorist, you’ve merely diverted my attention to any of a million other ways of wreaking havoc, with no net increase on public safety.

It’s as if we think terrorism is limited strictly to airplanes. What about trucks with fertilizer? Remember that? Biological weapons in a public arena, anyone? Dirty bombs? A terrorist need only apply a little creativity to cause serious harm. We can’t stop this stuff. And while that notion is terrifying, taking my toothpaste away won’t make it any better.

So please: check me for knives and for guns, and make sure I don’t have a history of hijacking airplanes. But if I’m just one of the n million Muslims who are our fellow citizens, or I care about my oral hygiene, leave me alone.

If the Gang Of Plutocrats want to repeal the (thoroughly inadequate) health care reform law, maybe a deal can be struck where Bush’s Heimatswehr (a.k.a. the Department of Homeland Security) also goes in the trash heap.

THE BIG MACHINES-BOMBZILLAS-ARE CHERTOFFS HYBRID SECURITY RESPONSE—-TO WHAT? REMINDS ME OF A SCENE FROM ROBO-COP-THE BIG BORG THINGS! HOW ABOUT SERIOUSLY ARMED CARBINE ARMED GUARDS POSTED-WITH 45 CALIBER UMPS-AND EVEN MORE PLAIN CLOTHES PROFILE OBSERVERS IN CONCENTRIC ZONES LEADING TO THE CONCOURSES? THE ONLY OFFENSIVE MOVES WOULD BE TO CLOSE IN AND SHOOT REAL OFFENDERS WHO ARE TERRORISTS-OR POINT OUT SUSPICIOUS PERSONS. “TOUCHY-FEELY” ISN’T GOING TO WORK-AND NOVEMBER 24TH WILL THROW THE MONKEY-WRENCH IN THE COG WHEELS. ENJOY INEPTITUDE,FOLKS-YOU EARNED EVERY PENNY YOU INVESTED IN NOT HIRING LEGITIMATE SECURITY—–FOOLS!