Live-blogging: What now for Obama?

AP101103015042.jpg

President Obama is holding a news conference to assess the meaning of yesterday’s elections. Let’s not waste time with the preamble and get right to it.

Opening statement: He says he spoke to leaders of both House and Senate. “Some election nights are more fun than others… power rests not with us in elected office but with the people we have the privilege to serve.” Says people are frustrated and they expect “Washington to work for them, not against them.” No one party will be allowed to dictate. Says he’s very easy to sit down with both parties.

(Bob: A lot of people on twitter were opining last night that the results showed that Obama shouldn’t have tried to work with the Republicans)

Background: Letters to the president.

Obama says he doesn’t want to refight the battles of the last two years over the next two years.

QUESTIONS

Q: Are you willing to concede last night was a rejection of your agenda?

There is no doubt that people’s number one concern is the economy and they were expressing we haven’t made enough progress on the economy. I’m the president of the United States and my job is to improve the economy and I have to take direct responsibility that we haven’t made enough progress.

Moving forward, the question is whether Democrats and Republicans can sit down and make progress; I think we can.

(Wayback machine: After President Bush’s first mid-term election, he did not have a news conference the next day. His spokesman held a briefing, instead. Here’s the transcript)

Q: Can the voters conclude you’re just not getting it?

Over the last two years, we’ve made a series of tough decisions but decisions that were right in moving the country forward and not slipping into a second Great Depression. With all that stuff coming at folks fast and furious… I think people started looking at all this and it felt as though government was getting much more intrusive into people’s lives than they were accustomed to. The reason is that it was an emergency. Maybe people thought it was an agenda, rather than a response to an emergency.

When I won election in 2008, people were excited about the prospect of changing how things got done. We were in such a hurry to get things done, we didn’t think about how things got done.

(The obvious question here is whether Obama overreached?)

Q: Republicans ran against your health care law. Do you believe health care reform is in danger?

It’ll be an issue that comes up. We’d be misreading the election if we thought the American people want us to relitigate over the next two years. (“Relitigate?” The president will not ever be mistaken for Harry Truman.)

When I talk to parents who are relieved their children can stay on policies until they’re 26, or small businesses taking advantage of tax credits, I say to myself, “this was the right thing to do.” If Republicans have ideas for improving the health care system… I’m happy to consider some of those ideas.

He says the “1099 provision” in the health care bill needs to be changed. Here’s an explanation of what that is.

Q: One out of two voters think it should be repealed…

That means one out of two voters think it’s the right thing to do.

Q: Do you accept that any kind of spending to create jobs is dead?

People are concerned about spending and deficits. I’ll have a deficits commission putting forth ideas. We can eliminate programs that don’t work and cut back spending that is inefficient. The question my Republican friends… are going to have to answer is, “What are our priorities?” That’s going to be a tough debate. We already had a big deficit that I inherited that has been made worse because of the recession.

We just learned that China has the fastest supercomputer in the world. That used to be us.

We can extend unemployment insurance right now (perhaps, that’ll be the first big debate; Republicans think that motivates people not to look for work).

Without any Republican support on anything, it’ll be hard to get things done; I’m not going to anticipate that we’re not going to get things done.

Q: After your election two years ago, you said “elections have consequences.” What consequences do you think this one should have? What are you willing to compromise on?

I’ve been willing to compromise in the past and I will going forward. Many Republicans ran against the energy bill that passed in the House; it’s doubtful you can get the votes to pass an energy bill this year, or next year, or the year after. That doesn’t mean we can’t have an energy policy. Let’s find out where we agree.

We’re probably going to have to say, “there’s too many areas of disagreement and we can’t get this done right now.”

Q: Are you willing to compromise on the expiring Bush tax cuts? And when you see 19 state legislatures go to the other side, etc., what does it feel like?

It feels bad. The toughest thing is seeing really terrific public servants not have the opportunity to serve anymore. Many have told me “I don’t have regrets, because we’re doing the right thing.” They might be just trying to make me feel better.

Re: tax cuts. My goal is to make sure we don’t have a huge spike in taxes for middle-class families. It would be bad for our economy. It is very important that we’re not taking a whole bunch of money out of the system from people who are most likely to spend that money on goods, services, groceries, etc. My goal is to sit down with Speaker-elect Boehner and Mitch McConnell and Nancy and see where we can move forward in a way that, first of all, does no harm and extends tax cuts that are important for middle-class families and those that encourage businesses to invest. How that negotiation works itself out, I think it’s too early to say.

Q: What about EPA regulations? Do you wish in retrospect you had not made some deals?

Making sure families have security and we’re on the way to lowering health care costs was absolutely correct. It’s an ugly mess when it comes to process. That’s something that really affected how people viewed the outcome. I regret that we couldn’t have made the process healthier, but the outcome was a good one.

Re: EPA: The smartest thing for us to do is see if we can get Democrats and Republicans in a room who are serious about energy independence and see if there’s way to make progress in the short term and make progress on technology in the long term. The EPA is under a court order that says greenhouse gasses are a pollutant that fall under its jurisdiction. We have to find ways to solve this problem without hurting the economy.

Q: Is it possible that there are a majority of Americans who think your policies are taking the nation in reverse. And what about “don’t ask, don’t tell”? Do you have to tell your liberal base you’re not going to be able to get it done?

If someone is willing to put their lives on the line, they should not be prevented from doing so because of sexual orientation. The overwhelming majority of Americans feel the same way. Making this change needs to be done in an orderly fashion that maintains discipline. A review comes out at the beginning of the month that will have surveyed attitudes in the armed forces. That will give us time to act during the lame duck session to change this policy. We’ve got a bunch of court cases out there, too. It’ll be bad for morale to have this bouncing around in the courts where the Pentagon doesn’t know what rules they’re working under. We need certainty. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue.

The American people understand we’ve dug ourselves a pretty big hole and we’re not out of the ditch yet. At the very least we were pushing in opposite directions.

When I came into office, this economy was in freefall and the economy has stabilized and the economy has grown. It’s hard to argue we’re going backwards. You can argue we’re stuck in neutral.

(Bob: Here’s what that analogy is all about:)

Q: Do you need to hit the “reset” button with business?

One of the things that has not been managed well by me is finding the right balance with business and treating customers fairly, and making clear that the only way America succeeds is if businesses are succeeding. The reason we have an unparalleled standard of living is because we have a free market, and that needs to be nurtured and cultivated. We’ve had a successive set of issues where business too the notion that business is always the bad guy. The most important thing we can do is to boost and encourage our business sector and make sure that they’re hiring.

Q: How do you respond to voters seeing you as out of touch?

I might have a funny name and lived in various places, but hard work and honest values are the same values I took from mom and my grandparents. When I’m out of this place, it’s not an issue. When you’re in this place, it’s hard not to seem removed. Those letters that I read every night, some of them break my heart, some of them fill me with inspiration. But nobody is filming me reading those letters.

(Bob notes: Have you ever watched senators and congresspeople and the life they live and where they live it? It’s impossible to be in touch. You also have thousands of people screaming telling you how wonderful you are — or not. Does that happen to you on any given day?)

Getting out of here is good for me, too. I always come away from those interractions feeling so much more optimistic about this country. We have such a good and decent people who are finding ways to live together, educate kids, grow their communities, create businesses. The American people always make me optimistic. As tough as it’s been, as many sometimes scary moments as we’ve gone through, I’ve never doubted that we’re going to emerge stronger than we were before.

— End of news conference —

Post-script: Presidential letters.

Now, it’s your turn:

How are you feeling about America’s futurecustomer surveys

  • MR

    I’m feeling a little confused by the questions that were asked. “Can the voters conclude that you’re just not getting it?” What valuable information did the reporter expect to get out of that? Did he/she expect the president to say, “Yes, I just don’t get it?” It really felt like the reporters all had their versions of the stories they wanted to write put together, and were trying to fit the president’s comments into those stories.

  • Bob Collins

    No, it’s not that they had a version of the story they already had written, it’s an attempt to pre-empt the gobbledygook that politicians utter when asked simple questions in a simple way. You just ask it in such a stark way, that the pol goes off script and issues a more honest and straightforward answer.

    Sometimes it works; sometimes it doesn’t.