Minnesota is at serious risk of losing seat in Congress

New population estimates released Wednesday show Minnesota is in serious trouble of losing a U.S. House seat and would have to leapfrog other states to keep its current eight.

The 2017 estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau forecast that Minnesota is about 30,500 people shy of retaining its current complement in Congress based on the population shifts in other parts of the country. The once-a-decade reapportionment won’t happen until after the official American head count done in 2020, so nothing is certain.

But Minnesota would have to catch several breaks to keep from losing ground. Two states also projected to lose seats — New York and West Virginia — were closer to keeping their current delegations intact. Three states that did wind up above the cut line — Alabama, Colorado and Rhode Island — did so narrowly.

So there are enough moving parts where Minnesota could still eke out its eight when the final figures come out following the exhaustive 2020 census. A lot is riding on the amount of effort state and local governments put into ensuring the federal count captures their populations as accurately as possible.

Minnesota’s 2017 population was pegged at 5,576,606, up from 5,457,173 in 2010. The growth percentage was just shy of the national average so State Demographer Susan Brower isn’t ready to concede the loss of a seat.

“It’s going to be hard but I don’t think it’s impossible,” she said. “I think it’s definitely in reach.”

Minnesota has had eight seats in Congress since the 1960s, when it lost one. It had lost another a few decades before that.

Redrawn political maps would be effective for the 2022 election cycle.

Under an analysis using a calculator from the University of Michigan’s Population Studies Research Center, the current population estimates would have the following effect on representation in the 435-seat Congress.

Gain seats:

  • Colorado +1
  • Florida +1
  • North Carolina +1
  • Oregon +1
  • Texas +2

Lose seats:

  • Illinois -1
  • Michigan -1
  • Minnesota -1
  • New York -1
  • Pennsylvania -1
  • West Virginia -1

(h/t @dataandinfo at American Public Media’s APM Research Lab)

  • This is interesting but not so good for our state. We need to seriously step-up to figure the best possible way to not lose a seat! oh yeah, and please let us not wait!

  • Rasta Man

    We should add 100 seats to Congress imho.

    • JH

      And what would that help?
      Just more politicians to pay?

      • Rasta Man

        Harder to bribe.

        • JH

          or more of them to bribe

          • Rasta Man

            Costs more at least.

  • Al

    All but one are from light blue/dark blue states. With the exception of Oregon, those electoral votes are going to competitive or reddish states. Good. The less political power NY, Illinois, CA has, the better

    • ArthurFrayne

      Don’t underestimate Colorado. District 6 (Mike Coffman) is VERY likely to flip in 2018 in this current climate and adding a new one could easily result in a blue district as much as it could red.

  • Doo_Right

    The Republican Tax Scam that just passed should be a good reminder to all on which party does not stand up for the middle class, seniors and poor. Once the deficit explodes, they’re cutting social security, medicare and medicaid. Votes matter!