Dayton: No 2016 tax cut deal without more pre-K funding

Gov. Mark Dayton and Stephanie Hogenson of the Children’s Defense Fund-Minnesota discussed the latest Kids Count Data Book report at a news conference in Minneapolis. Tim Pugmire | MPR News

Updated: 4:10 p.m. | Posted: 2 p.m.

  1. Listen Story audio

The next session of the Legislature is eight months away, but Gov. Mark Dayton already is warning state lawmakers not to let preschool students take a back seat to tax cuts.

During a Minneapolis news conference on Tuesday Dayton said he would not sign a tax bill next session unless the Legislature also sends him another funding increase for early childhood education.

Dayton issued his early ultimatum during an event that highlighted Minnesota’s top ranking in a new report on children. The analysis from the Annie E. Casey Foundation and the Children’s Defense Fund ranked Minnesota No. 1 overall when measuring economic conditions, education, health and other factors.

Despite the top ranking, Dayton said too many disparities remain for children of color. He said that’s why he’ll keep pushing to use some of the anticipated budget surplus for early childhood education funding next year.

“We’ve had good revenue forecast now in the last couple of months,” the governor said. “We’ll have to wait until November to see how it all balances out. But anybody … in the Legislature who thinks they’re going to give all this money back in tax cuts better understand that I will not sign a tax bill that does not have an equitable amount in it overall for early childhood and for continuing the progress that we’ve made here.”

Early education was a major sticking point this year and wasn’t resolved until last month’s special session. Dayton eventually signed an education bill that increased funding for early learning scholarships, school readiness and Head Start. But he backed off his previous demand for preschool for every 4-year-old in the state.

Looking ahead to the session that begins March 8, Dayton said he does not yet have a definitive early education proposal for 2016.

“We’re going to keep making that the priority of my administration, and anything else is going to have to take second place and not precede it.”

Republicans have their own priorities. Tax cuts and transportation funding are at the top of their list, and even if the surplus doesn’t keep growing, the Legislature has more than $800 million that was left unspent in 2015.

House Speaker Kurt Daudt said he’s willing to discuss other issues — from education and transportation to tax relief — but he doesn’t like ultimatums.

“We shouldn’t connect all of these things and try to say that I’m not going to give you this if you don’t give me that,” said Daudt, R-Crown. “Why don’t we look at all of those areas individually and do what’s right in each of those areas?”

State finance officials will provide a clearer picture of the expected budget surplus in November.

Senate Minority Leader David Hann said he doesn’t see the need for any more spending, even with a surplus.

“We had a significant increase in spending in this budget that we just passed,” said Hann, R-Eden Prairie. “If we are still collecting money in excess of that budget that should be an indication that we need to look at our tax code.”

  • Pit Boss

    It is never enough for progressives. They are already taxing us to death and now Gov. Goggle Eyes won’t allow any tax cuts until he can start the indoctrination process at 3 years of age. This is why you never give politicians an inch because they will take 10 miles.

    • Dave M

      Taxing you to death eh? Is your obituary online somewhere? I’d like to read it.

      Back in reality, unless you’re among the top 2% of earners in Minnesota, then your tax did not change under Dayton. If you ARE in the top 2%, then congratulations! You have a very high income!

      • Pit Boss

        Typical progressive response. Where do you think the $2 billion “surplus” (excessive taxation) came from? It’s not all from the rich. There are a whole host of taxes that affected those not in the top 2% but of course that doesn’t fit into the progressive chanting points.
        The so called rich should not be on the hook for every liberal wet dream of social engineering.
        By the way, it’s my money first and then the government may have some, not the other way around which is obviously how progressives think. If I do have a high income, I earned it and neither you nor the government has a right to confiscate it for your “social justice” boondoggles.