Gov. Mark Dayton said Wednesday he is open to legislation declaring it unlawful to stage protests that spill onto freeways or tie up airport access roads as long as it doesn’t become a “dragnet” to quash dissent.

In an interview with MPR News, Dayton said his decision on signing the measure will depend on how lawmakers word their bill. Last year, he objected to a proposal during final negotiations with the Republican-led Legislature, and it got set aside in the end.

“The language last year was too broad and too vague and could be misused to restrict people’s right to lawful, free assembly,” Dayton said, adding, “If it’s going to be just sort of a broader dragnet to limit people’s First Amendment rights, I’m not going to be supportive.”

But Dayton said that there is room for some restrictions in the name of public safety.

“People who are driving at reasonable but proper speeds come around the corner but suddenly traffic is halted, there is a public safety risk and there is a risk to law enforcement,” he said.

As for the protesters, he said, “they would have to be responsible about where they choose to launch their protests. I would define it very carefully and specifically that shutting down an interstate freeway or access to an airport constitutes an unlawful act.”

The Minnesota House could vote at any point on a protest bill sponsored by Rep. Nick Zerwas, R-Elk River. It makes it a gross misdemeanor to interfere with or obstruct traffic on freeways and ramps, along airport access roads and on dedicated transit routes.

The bill is a response to several protests in recent years — some after high-profile police shootings — that moved onto Minnesota interstates or disrupted other traffic.

Informed of Dayton’s comments, Zerwas said they give him optimism that something can become law this year.

“Minnesotans expect to be able to drive on the freeway. They expect to be able to drive to the airport to make a flight or to pick up a loved one,” Zerwas said. “And they expect to be able to use public transportation in a convenient and easy way that isn’t delayed by people using bicycle lock to chain their necks together to prevent movement of the train.”

Many legislative Democrats have pushed back on the bill as a crackdown on free speech.

A gross misdemeanor charge can result in up to a year in jail and a $3,000 fine.

In the interview, which covered a range of issues being debated this session, Dayton reiterated his opposition to a bill that expands what constitutes legal fireworks for purchase in the state. He said he is also against a bill promoted by abortion opponents that would require physicians to inform women of their right to see ultrasound pictures prior to an abortion.

Dayton said he is partial to groups that represent medical professionals who argue that the requirement “intrudes on the doctor-patient relationship and there should not be politicians mucking around in what the relationship is between a physician and his or her patients. I think that is a prudent stance, and I would not support that legislation.”

The ultrasound bill was endorsed Tuesday night by a House health committee. Minnesota Citizens Concerned For Life legislative director Andrea Rau said more than two dozen states have such a law.

“Ultrasound provides women with factual medical information,” Rau said. “When women have more information prior to having an abortion, they can be more confident in making a decision best for them, and less likely to make a decision they will regret.”

Minnesota’s experimentation with cameras in courtrooms would come to a halt under legislation on the move at the state Capitol.

The House Public Safety and Security Committee held a hearing Wednesday on the bill (HF 3436) and kept it in play for further action later this session.

The bill would prohibit court officials from using state funds to expand audio and video coverage of criminal court proceedings. Such coverage has been recently allowed in very limited circumstances under a pilot program.

Rep. Jim Knoblach, R-St. Cloud, is the chief sponsor of the bipartisan bill. Rep. Debra Hilstrom, DFL-Brooklyn Center, is a co-sponsor.

During the committee hearing, Knoblach warned that cameras could hinder cooperation.

“If reporting a crime means the world can watch a report on the 10:00  news or see it forever on YouTube or elsewhere, some victims and witnesses will decide it’s just not worth it,” Knoblach said.

Caroline Palmer of the Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault echoed the concern.

“Victims may be less likely than ever to report the crime,” Palmer said

Mark Anfinson, a lawyer for the Minnesota Newspaper Association, spoke against the bill. Anfinson argued that there is no evidence to back up the claims of bill supporters.

“The pilot projects have shown that cameras cause absolutely no discernible problems for anybody in Minnesota courts, none,” Anfinson said.

Another bill opponent raised constitutional concerns.

Sonia Miller-Van Oort, president of the Minnesota State Bar Association, told lawmakers that her organization supports the concept of the bill but opposes it on separation-of-powers grounds.

“What the legislation seems to be suggesting is that it would be appropriate for the Legislature to dictate to the separate branch of the Judiciary how it should conduct its business,” Miller-Van Ooert said. “It’s in that way that we have a concern.”

A bill providing Minnesota tax incentives for people affected by or helping aid in recovery from three 2017 hurricanes has received a positive reception from state lawmakers.

On Wednesday, the Senate Taxes Committee kept the bill alive for possible inclusion in the session’s bigger tax package. The bill’s cosponsors include both Republican and Democratic caucus leaders.

State Sen. Melisa Franzen, DFL-Edina, is the bill’s chief sponsor. She told of her struggles reaching family in Puerto Rico when it was devastated by Hurricane Maria six months ago. She said the island is still suffering from the aftermath.

“It means a lot personally but it means a lot in terms of the statement that we’d be making as Minnesotans that we care about our fellow Americans,” Franzen said.

She added, “This is a nonpartisan issue where we can come together and say we care about U.S. citizens and Americans no matter where they live.”

Franzen said 100 Puerto Rican families are known to have relocated to Minnesota since the storm.

The bill would allow them to draw up to $100,000 from retirement savings without normal tax penalties to respond to severe damage; they would have to repay the account or spread the tax impact over a few years. Filers could claim deductions for casualty losses sooner and even if they don’t itemize. The bill also would affect how last year’s charitable deductions are treated for tax purposes.

The measures match changes made at the federal level.

Aside from Hurricane Maria, the legislation also encompasses fallout from Harvey and Irma.