Supeme Court agrees to hear political speech case

Updating Thursday’s News Cut post about a case in Washington state that tests whether signing a political petition is protected speech (and whether, like a vote, it should be confidential): today the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide the case. It’s the second time this week the court has waded into a question brought about because of concerns from opponents of same-sex marriage that publicity could lead to their harassment.

ScotusBlog has the story:


The outcome of the case could affect publicity about petition-signers in the 27 states that have either an initiative or a referendum option for voters, or both. The core constitutional issues in the case are whether signing a ballot measure petition is a form of political speech, whether, if it is protected by the First Amendment, it includes a right to sign without official public disclosure, what standard is to be applied when judging regulation of such a First Amendment right, and what government interest supports disclosure rather than confidentiality for signers’ identities.

But the earliest the court would hear arguments in the case is late April.

Comments are closed.