Notes from Planet Journalism

Two items testing ethical waters in journalism today.

CLUNKERS VS. KATRINA

NPR’s ombudsman, Alicia Shepard, takes NPR’s Mara Liasson to task for this:

Says Shepard:


Nearly 2,000 people died and thousands more were injured or lost their homes during Hurricane Katrina in 2005. The Bush administration’s inability to help hundreds of thousands of people in New Orleans after Katrina is considered one of the greatest recent examples of government incompetence.

It is inconceivable anyone could compare that disaster to Cash for Clunkers, which simply gives people a voucher worth up to $4,500 to trade in an old car for a newer, more fuel-efficient vehicle.

Liasson, meanwhile, is contrite. “I said something really stupid, which I regret,” Liasson told Shepard.

NAMING VICTIMS

Anytime a news organization plays the “withhold the name/don’t withhold the name” game, it runs into a minefield of ethical questions.

Generally speaking, news organizations in these parts withhold the name of people who have been arrested until they’ve been charged. But most apply the guideline inconsistently.

One canon that the Associated Press has is not naming victims of a sexual assault.

But the AP couldn’t see the case of the Wisconsin man coming who, apparently, played around on his wife with four (or more) women, and then was attacked by them. The AP did not name the man because he’s a victim of a sexual assault. So far, so good.

Then he got himself arrested on an allegation of child abuse. Now is he a victim? Or a perpetrator who can be named? This morning, the news organization named him once he was charged.

But by afternoon, the AP issued this advisory:


Please note BC-US–Cheater Assaulted, 1st ld-Writethru, which makes an important change deleting the suspect’s name because he is named as the victim of a sexual assault in another case.

The AP named three of the women charged in the case, but didn’t name the fourth.

Because he’s the man’s wife, identifying her would identify him.

  • bob

    Please. This clown isn’t a sexual assault victim within the normal meaning of the term.

    From what I understand, he was attacked because of his horn dog behavior by the people who had grounds to be upset by this behavior. I’m not saying that they inflicted an appropriate punishment, just that this situation clearly puts this guy far outside the realm of the class of sexual assault victim that the “name withheld” construct is intended to protect.

  • bobbydole

    Wow.. fox just loves to play that clip..

  • John P.

    Mara should watch out who she hangs around with. If you play with the kids from Fox, pretty soon you start to talk and act like them.