Live-blogging the presidential debate


Please do not answer the following poll if you didn’t answer yes above. I know a lot of candidate backers want to create the impression that there’s been a big swing by saying they’ve swung to their candidate when they already were for their candidate. So take a powder on this and let’s see whether there’s any real shift. Thanks.


We’re live blogging the presidential debate at Hofstra University tonight, or — as the Daily Show blog puts it — “The Scoff-stra at Hofstra.” Bob Schieffer of CBS is moderating the debate. Jeff Greenfield, longtime media watcher, has an article on Slate above how Schieffer can shake things up a bit. His opening paragraphs, however, actually reveal how time inside the Beltway has rendered Greenfield utterly incapable of being an observer, otherwise he wouldn’t dismiss the criticisms of the debates so far so easily.

Let’s see. So far we’ve had drinking games and bingo games based on the debate. Now, Comedy Channel has come up with the “Energizing Your Base” game, but caution: adults only.

Nick Gorski of Stillwater has just sent us this picture of a Halloween decoration in his community:

severed_head_obama.jpg

Gorski says people are stopping to have their picture taken with the display.

4:41 p.m. – My wife sent me the latest email today that claimed all sorts of “facts” and a dark past for one candidate. Appropriate, then, that CNN has a piece on its Web site now about how candidates hit back — or not — against these online efforts.

5:04 p.m. - Just in: Conservatives win in Canada, but not enough for a majority in Parliament. Quick: Name the prime minister of Canada!

5:43 p.m. – Take that, Greenfield. Justin Webb of the BBC says the woeful performance of the moderators in this presidential debate season isn’t our imagination:


So will tonight’s debate moderator, Bob Schieffer, rescue US broadcasters from the woeful depths? I see no great hope in this piece, but the hopeless, incompetent, lazy, cringe-inducing performance of the “anchors” so far will not be difficult to improve tonight.

5:50 p.m. – Behind the scenes, is Barack Obama trying to goad John McCain into bringing up William Ayers’ name this evening. The New York Times’ politicos suggest it:


Mr. Obama may have been trying to goad Mr. McCain into bringing up Mr. Ayers tonight when he said that Mr. McCain was too afraid to bring him up in the last debate. Mr. McCain said Tuesday that Mr. Obama’s suggestion that “I didn’t have the guts” to bring up Mr. Ayers last time “probably ensured” that it would come up this time. It is possible that both candidates are trying to create a climate that will force Mr. Schieffer to bring the matter up.

6:06 p.m. - Via Romanesko, the academics are saying pretty much what you’d expect the academics to say on the subject of the “dial-testing results” on CNN during debates.. a sort of “mood ring” of those being surveyed:


“It has no scientific validity — it’s not a sample of anything that has generalized validity,” says Rutgers Univeristy’s Cliff Zukin.

It’s true, it may not be scientific. But so what? Why can’t it simply be interesting. There’s nothing scientific about the talking heads or spin rooms. There’s nothing scientific about what academics you choose to comment, but that doesn’t mean it can’t have some value by virtue of being interesting, and lead to further depth — later — by exploring the why of a reaction rather than the what of it.

From what we’ve seen in the debates so far, the unscientific sampling is turned off the stump speeches and turned on by specific answers to questions. From that alone, we can extrapolate that the focus group is smarter than all of the moderators in the debates so far.

7:30 p.m. – We’re 30 minutes away. This production tonight is costing Hofstra $3.5 million.

LIVE BLOGGING

7:57 p.m. – Bob Schieffer has just been introduced. I have to admit, he’s #1 on my list of people I’d love to have dinner with. He says he only wishes Tim Russert were still alive to be there.

8:00 p.m. - Both candidates are now on stage. They both greeted each other warmly.

Q: Why is your economic plan better than your opponent’s

McCain: Says — three times — that Americans are angry. Again calls for government to buy mortgages of homeowners. (CNN Fact check: Would this shift burden to taxpayers)

Obama: Calls for cracking down on companies shifting jobs overseas, allow people to access IRAs without penalty. Middle class tax cuts necessary.

Discussion: McCain talks about “Joe the Plumber” and says Obama would raise taxes. He says Obama’s response to Joe would be to “spread Joe’s wealth around.” Obama says Joe’s been getting his information from McCain’s campaign ads.

“Why would you want to increase anyone’s taxes right now?” McCain asks.

“I want to cut taxes for 95% of Americans,” Obama says. Acknowledges Warren Buffet will pay more in taxes, to give more to Joe the Plumber.

How happy are you right now if you’re this guy?

This year’s deficit will be $455 billion. Your proposals will add to the deficit. Won’t some of your programs have to be trimmed or eliminated? (Here’s a link to the group that showed both candidates would increase the deficit)

Obama: Says bailout will mean taxpayers will get their money back but acknowledges people have lived beyond their means. Says he proposed a net spending cut. Schieffer — God bless him — asks him to answer the question. Obama says investment in health care will save money in the long run. Same with education. “We’re not going to be able to go back to our profligate ways. (He didn’t answer the question)

McCain: If we can start increasing home values, we can create wealth. “But what are you going to cut,”Schieffer asks. McCain says we need nuclear power, offshore drilling. “If we become energy independent, we will create jobs.” Calls, again, for an across-the-board spending freeze. (Note: He put defense outside this freeze in the last debate.)

Discussion: Obama tackles McCain’s opposition to earmarks. Says it is only 1/2 of 1 percent of the budget. Notes that there was a surplus when Clinton left office. (There was also 9/11, and a war that Obama voted for.)

“If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should’ve run four years ago,” McCain says. Notes that Obama has voted for tax increases, and voted for an energy bill “full of goodies for the oil companies that I opposed.” Says Obama hasn’t stood up to his party leaders.

Obama says he voted for tort reform, clean coal technology. “I have a history of reaching across the aisle.”

Politifact has looked at McCain’s assertion and found it to be true.

Are each of you willing to sit at this table and say to each other what you’ve said in your commercials?

McCain: Regrets negative tone that he finds unacceptable. Criticizes Rep. John Lewis for his remarks on hate speech. Says Obama didn’t repudiate remarks. Says he’s repudiated all remarks that were “out of bounds.”

Obama: Says 100% of McCain’s ads have been negative. “That’s not true,” McCain says. “It is true,” Obama said.

Not sure what the point of the question was here, to get the candidates to take responsibility for the negative ads, or to juice up tonight’s debate. Unless I missed it, there was no mention here of William Ayers.

McCain says Obama is running ads saying he opposes stem cell research. “I don’t,” McCain says.

Obama says Lewis was “troubled” by “kill him” and “terrorists” and says Palin didn’t stop the peuople shouting it to tell them it was out of line.

“You’ve got to read what he said,” McCain said. “I’m proud of the people who come to our rallies.” He says, again, he’s repudiated those who were out of line.

Obama: “What I think is most important is to solve the key problems we’re facing…. Democrats, Independents, and Republicans… we’re going to have to be able to work together and disagree without being disagreeable.”

McCain: “I don’t care about a washed-up terrorists, but we need to know the extent of your involvement.” Also says ACORN has committed one of the biggest voter frauds in history.

Obama: Says Ayers has become the centerpiece of McCain’s campaign. Says Ayers is a professor of education. Acknowledges he engaged in “despicable acts” when Obama was 8 years old. Says he and Ayers served on a school reform board funded by “one of Ronald Reagan’s close friends.” Notes that several Republicans served on the board. “Mr. Ayers is not involved in my campaign.”

On ACORN, says they were paying people to register votes and some people didn’t register people, “they just filled out a bunch of names. It had nothing to do with us.” (Good article on this in NewsWeek.)

McCain and Obama sparred on the assertion that Obama “launched his campaign in Mr. Ayers living room.”

Q: Why would the country be better off if your running mate became president rather than his running mate?

Obama: Joe Biden has some of the best foreign policy credentials. In his entire life, he’s “never forgotten where he came from.” He’s been on the right side of the issues.

McCain: Palin is a reformer. She has ignited the party. Also talks about advocacy for special needs kids. ( At what point does the federal government’s refusal to fund special needs mandates become a question?)

8:46 p.m. Outside the debate hall, a protest has made the street look like September in St. Paul.

debate_protest.jpg

Q: Give us a number of how much you believe we can reduce foreign oil imports in your first term?

McCain: We can eliminate dependence on Middle East and Venezuela. Calls for 45 new nuclear power plants “right away.” Says Obama’s contention that storage has to be safe is the view of “extreme environmentalists.”

Fact: We import 17% of our oil from the Middle East. We import 11% of our oil from Venezuela.

Obama: Also believe we can eliminate Middle East imports. Wants to put resources into solar, wind and biodiesel. Wants a “use ‘em or lose ‘em” policy on current offshore oil leases.

How are you enjoying the debate? I think it’s the best debate so far, but our commenters think it lacks substance. I’ll have to watch this again later. Schieffer seems to know when to get out the way.

8:54 p.m. The question started on energy. Somehow we got onto free trade.

Q: Would you favor controlling health care costs over expanding health care coverage?

Obama: “We have to do both.” Says his plan lowers costs, that the average family’s premium could be reduced by $2,500. If you don’t have health insurance, you could buy into the same pool that Congress uses.

McCain: Reduce costs by putting health care records online. Wants phys ed programs in school. Wants to give American families $5,000 refundable tax credit . Talks to Joe the Plumber and says Obama is going to “fine you if you don’t get Obama’s health care plan.” Is Joe the Plumber and Joe Sixpack the same guy?

Obama: “Here’s your fine, Joe: Zero,” Obama says, because his plan exempts small businesses. Says right now we pay $900 a year in higher premiums because of the uninsured who go to emergency rooms and/or are picked up by Medicare. Obama also looks into the camera and speak to Joe. What about Bob?

Obama says McCain’s $5,000 tax plan will cause 20 million people — older, less healthy — to lose their employer-based health care coverage.

McCain smirks and Obama says “that’s your plan, John.” McCain, still smirking, shakes his head “yes.” Major mistake in body language by McCain.

“Hey, Joe, you’re rich,” McCain says, noting that Joe’s business is doing so well, he doesn’t get the “zero” fine. Did Obama just maneuver McCain into defending the rich?

Note: Here’s a good site for comparing the candidates’ health care plans.

Q: Could you nominate someone to the Supreme Court who doesn’t support your position on Roe v. Wade? (Abortion)

McCain: Says he wouldn’t apply a litmus test and disagrees with Roe v. Wade. ( McCain reportedly wanted to consider two men who were pro-choice for vice president. Reportedly, the abortion issue prevented him from doing so.)

9:10 p.m. Here, McCain said something interesting. He would judge people on their qualifications, but then seemed to say someone who supported Roe v. Wade wouldn’t be qualified. I’ll have to doublecheck that quote later but it may have been significant.

Update 9:50 p.m. I checked the transcript. here’s what McCain said:


I would consider anyone in their qualifications. I do not believe that someone who has supported Roe v. Wade that would be part of those qualifications. But I certainly would not impose any litmus test.

I guess we could parse that any number of ways. Looking back, I think now he was saying that a judge’s record on abortion cases would not be considered.

Obama: Also says no litmus test but says he strongly supports Roe v. Wade.

McCain says Obama voted in the Illinois Senate that denied immediate medical attention to a child born in a “failed abortion.”

Obama says “if it sounds incredible that I voted to withhold care from an infant, that’s not true.” He says the bill would’ve undermine Roe v. Wade and there was already a law on the books that required life-saving treatment. On partial birth abortion, “I’m supportive of a ban on late-term abortions as long as there’s an exception for the mother’s health and life. ”

Background: Interesting column in St. Petersburg times on Obama and abortion.

McCain: Res Obama’s language, he says “health” of the mother (he says with finger curley q’s) could mean just about anything.

Despite spending the most money on education, by most every measure, we trail the rest of the world. Is this a national security issue?

Obama: There’s never been a country that saw its economy decline and was able to keep its military powerful. Calls for more investment in early childhood education to close achievement gap. Need to recruit more teachers with higher pay in exchange for higher standards. Says parents need to do more and turn off the TV and video games.

McCain: It’s the civil rights issue of the century. “Choice and competition is one of the key elements.” Embraces charter schools, and full in-state tuition programs.

Also said this:

“We need to encourage programs such as Teach for America and Troops to Teachers where people, after having served in the military, can go right to teaching and not have to take these examinations which — or have the certification that some are required in some states.”

(It’s an interesting proposition but for discussion purposes, why should some teachers not have to be certified if they were soldiers first? Here’s the Troops to Teachers Web site. From what I can tell, the program does not wave certification requirements. But if you’ve become a teacher through this program, I’d love to do a post about it. Please contact me.)

Q: More money for schools from federal government?

Obama: Brings up the refusal of the federal government to pay for special education, but stops short of federal money. Also says he supporters charter schools, despite opposition of teachers unions. Opposes vouchers (basically, choice).

Obama served up a fat pitch to McCain here by saying “you can’t just propose things and not say how you’re going to pay for them. McCain missed the pitch.

McCain: Says No Child Left Behind was a “great first beginning, but it had its flaws.” McCain says “spending more money isn’t the answer.” Then says Head Start is a “great program” and adds it’s not doing what it’s supposed to do. Brings up Palin’s autistic baby (the baby has Down Syndrome), says “we’ll find the money to find a cure,” and then somehow connects it to school funding and vouchers but , frankly, it was too disjointed to follow the thought.

Update 9:55 p.m. – Here’s what he said. Looking back on the transcript, it actually was the most disjointed moment of the debate:


But, again, spending more money isn’t always the answer. I think the Head Start program is a great program. A lot of people, including me, said, look, it’s not doing what it should do. By the third grade many times children who were in the Head Start program aren’t any better off than the others.

Let’s reform it. Let’s reform it and fund it. That was, of course, out-of-bounds by the Democrats. We need to reform these programs. We need to have transparency. We need to have rewards. It’s a system that cries out for accountability and transparency and the adequate funding.

And I just said to you earlier, town hall meeting after town hall meeting, parents come with kids, children — precious children who have autism. Sarah Palin knows about that better than most. And we’ll find and we’ll spend the money, research, to find the cause of autism. And we’ll care for these young children. And all Americans will open their wallets and their hearts to do so.

But to have a situation, as you mentioned in our earlier comments, that the most expensive education in the world is in the United States of America also means that it cries out for reform, as well.

And I will support those reforms, and I will fund the ones that are reformed. But I’m not going to continue to throw money at a problem. And I’ve got to tell you that vouchers, where they are requested and where they are agreed to, are a good and workable system. And it’s been proven.

Obama: Says he supporters charter schools and the two squabble over where the mayor of DC supports vouchers.

FINAL STATEMENTS

McCain: We’ve had a healthy discussion. Uses the phrase “my friends” for the first time tonight. Pretty standard stump speech. If you’ve read down this far, you’ve probably heard it and don’t need me to retype it.

Obama:Says America is going through tough times. Gives the “same failed policies” stump speech. If you’ve read down this far, you’ve probably heard it and don’t need me to retype it.

Schieffer concludes by ofifering advice from his mother: “Go vote now. It’ll make you feel big and strong. The candidates shook hands. “Good job,” McCain said to Obama.

  • Ana Lord

    I am sick and tired of the “he said, you said”, “you did, he did” blame game that both candidates are playing, McCain more so than Obama.

    What is important to me is: Should McCain wins and then cannot continue his duties, there is no way, in my book, that Sara Pailin would be a credible President. The US would certainly be the laughing stock of the world.

    The US is in a mess, the economy is horrid and credibility from the White House and Lawmakers in DC has gone down the toilet.

    Do I want more of the same mess for the next 4 years? I have to be insane and hallucinating to want that?

  • John

    I can’t imagine what would make someone think that McCain is equal to change! I guess these people are happy with the way things are?

  • http://tcviolin.com James

    Why are spending so much on an endless war? We need to end this war as soon as possible.

  • John

    More bait and switch by McCain

  • Robert W. Seidel

    Obama seems to be reciting his stump speech, including the tired line “that this is the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression,” and his plans for middle-class tax cut, 95% of working families will get a tax cut, etc.

    McCain can’t resist reducing complex economic issues to Joe Sixpack’s financial situation. Small business owners are unlikely to vote for Obama, but McCain’s base is too small for him to focus on them.

    The rhetoric of tax and spend, income redistribution versus Ireland’s 11% tax rate seems very familiar from the last debate. We are going to be voting for stump speeches rather than a demonstrated ability to think creatively about political issues.

    The moderator, of course, seems to encourage this by reiterating the hoary inquiries of his predecessors in the first two debates. No new answers are likely to be forthcoming from this process.

  • http://iwuzthinking.blogspot.com/ Bruce

    2nd highest tax rate? Compared to Denmark? Sweden? Norway? Hmm. That seems like more than one.

  • http://www.skyseastone.net/jvstin Paul

    I’m sick of “Joe the Plumber”.

  • Ana Lord

    Who in the world does McCain think he is fooling with the nonsense talk regarding Obama running a more negative campaign than he (McCain) is running. McCain is a sad case. Just look at McCain’s body language. His mouth is saying one thing, his body is saying something else.

    McCain is a very dangerous mind.

  • Ana Lord

    Who in the world does McCain think he is fooling with the nonsense talk regarding Obama running a more negative campaign than he (McCain) is running? McCain is a sad case. Just look at McCain’s body language. His mouth is saying one thing, his body is saying something else.

    McCain is a very dangerous mind.

  • Go Obama

    Denmark, Sweden, and Norway have social medical

  • Greg Wasberg

    This debate’s focus on the negative campaigning is enormously tedious!! Our country is on the verge of a depression and again we are being fed this garbage!!!

  • http://iwuzthinking.blogspot.com/ Bruce

    I wish we had socialized medicine. If you have a chronic illness, you probably do too.

  • Sandy Ellis

    Sarah Palin is certainly NOT a role model to me! She has united most of the women I know against the McCain-Palin ticket.

  • Shane

    I wish the moderator would get control of this debate. He has spent more time on campaign commercials and who hurt whos feelings than tangable issues. They are politicians, they don’t have feelings. Please talk about what will direct the country than what is popular in the media.

  • Go Obama

    lets just give them all of our money?!?!?!

    is that what McCain wants?

  • Dee

    I was hoping for a little more substance than the first debate I was able to watch. I am still not impressed by the pointing of fingers and re-iterating of previous material.

    I hope they start telling us what they are specifically going to do on many issues. I do hope tonight to know more of what they actually plan to do. I saw some of that for a little while with Obama, but I need more from both.

  • erik

    Question? Is it good or bad that McCain is constantly writing and Obama is not?

  • Robert W. Seidel

    McCain offers guilt by association, Sarah Palin, larger deficts, cuts in discretionary and increases in defense spending, vitriol and character assassination, invective and aggression. As an independent, he hews closely to the Republican line on cutting spending for social programs. and economic assistance for corporations and small businesses. Does he share their views on eviscerating OSHA and the EPA, deregulation and corporate welfare? Palin would say, “you betcha!”

  • Michelle

    So does anyone think this debate is helping McCain?

  • greg

    did McCain just say Columbia was the largest agriculture trading partner with the US? I thought Canada and Mexico were our largest trading partners.

  • Go Obama

    will the NLRB exist under a McCain administration?

  • Mrolfe

    My wife thinks Obama has a beautiful smile!

  • Go Obama

    who is checking McCain’s facts?!?

  • Greg

    Didn’t we used to have physical fitness classes in schools? I think we called it gym or P.E. or Phy Ed.

  • Obama Supporter

    Obama stays on the topic; is direct and coherent.

    McCain accuses Obama of being negative. Yet, for the most part, the first words out of McCain’s mouth with every exchange is negative. We, the American People,deserve better. Obama is the best candidate to lead our country!! Obama for President!

  • Heather S.

    I’ve about had it with the Joe the plumber comments. Very condesending.

  • Greg

    Ever had to purchase health insurance for a family? $5k doesn’t even get you started. When I heard McCain offer a $5k credit I was amazed at how out of touch he is. In which of his 7 houses did he dream up this plan?

  • Dee

    No more Joe the Plumber comments. Please! I roll my eyes over even more….

    Is McCain taking cues from Palin… not a good idea in the last Presidential debate. This is not a folksy small town hall town meeting.

    Joe six pack? now Joe the Plumber?… I am a little smarter than what this conversation is doing around “The Plumber”.

    Move on guys!

  • Bonnie

    Some one out there named Joe, is a plumber, and his friends are pouring beer all over him about now.

  • Ben

    Joe the Plummer plays poker with Joe Six pack. He also has a Skill saw in his garage that he “borrowed” from Joe months ago.

  • KT

    Does anyone think that the smirking, rolling of eyes and other behavior of John McCain is annoying?

  • Bob

    re: “Joe the Plumber”

    I may be a real dim bulb in this area, but I actually don’t follow McCain’s argument that cutting (business) taxes leads to creating more jobs.

    First, it sounds like a rehash of “trickle-down economics.” I don’t remember that that worked. Wasn’t that about the time CEO’s started getting 9-digit salaries? I remember worrying about my job a couple years after Reagan’s 1985 tax “cut.”

    Secondly, I have never worked for a company that hired people or “created jobs” based on taxes. If business warranted hiring, we hired. If Joe needs another plumber, he’ll go down to the union hall and get one, and send him/her back if business drops off. Also, don’t employee costs come out of gross revenues, while taxes are levied on income after expenses? So, companies who see potential profits in new areas will create jobs regardless of tax rates.

    This seems to be one of those conventional-wisdom talking points that sounds really really good if you don’t examine it.

    I wish somebody who has some practical experience to explain this, would.

    P.S. I think I heard on NPR that the highest tax rate is in Switzerland. But they have universal health coverage, retirement benefits, and paid college tuition. The Swiss are reportedly OK with the cost-benefit ratio.

  • Marjane

    Did you mistype Obama’s name in the Roe v. Wade discussion…or did McCain actually call him Osama? I must have missed that.

  • Stephanie

    I strongly object to Sen. McCain using the term “Pro-Abortion” in response to this question about Supreme Court Justices and Roe v. Wade. Sen. Obama is absolutely right in his correction that the term is “Pro-choice” and no one in his/her right mind is pro-abortion. McCain isn’t ignorant of this; he is just attempting to spin a difficult issue in his direction. The American people are smarter than that.

  • Greg

    The smirking and eye rolling just betrays McCains contempt for Obama. He seems angry that he has to actually compete for the Presidency with Obama.

  • Benjamin Van Sant

    Obama has become quite aloof. He has a very condescending manner.

    McCain is feisty.

    These two men represent very different political philosophies but it’s hard to tell from these debates, even these campaigns.

    Government cannot and should not be expected to take care of everything. Like Obama making note of McCain’s reference to autism – thinking the government is expected to raise more funds. I don’t believe that was McCain’s point, he only mentioned that Palin was an effective spokesperson for autism awareness.

  • Jill

    McCain is talking out of both sides of his mouth how can he talk about funding new autism research & then say he’s not going throwing money at problems & he’s going to cut govt spending??!! This guy just isn’t making any sense!!

    I also REALLY dislike the way he treats & belittles Obama.

  • carl peterson

    does mccain really think his attitude at the table is helping him? I may have had a slight few doubts about this campaign but there is no longer any doubt. and does mccain think, after the last 8 years and the collapse of our respect and standing in the world that we really need another hot headed cowboy in the white house?

  • Gail

    Trig has downs not autism.

  • Megan

    Has anyone else noticed that McCain has said twice that Trig Palin has autism rather than Downs? At least I assume that’s what he meant when he said Sarah Palin knows more about autism than anyone else.

  • BRR

    Palin a spokesperson for autism awareness? I guess I missed that one. Is that what the V.P. of the USA does? Who knew.

  • Kim Chapman

    This format worked better than the other two. By now we’ve heard the candidates’ answers to the questions, but it was informative to hear the back and forth between them. Rebuttals were easier to make and I wish I had a fact-checker in a box to make the final decision as to who was right. Remarkably, Obama was able to tie just about everything he was asked to comment on back to the economy with little reference to McCain’s perspective, while McCain spent a lot of time raising questions about Obama’s values and past actions. It left me wondering if most Americans saw the same thing–which might account for Obama’s surge in the polls, reflective of America’s concern about the economy right now.

  • http://iwuzthinking.blogspot.com/ Bruce

    Quick check w/OECD data McCain may be correct if only corp. tax rates are considered. Personal income taxes are a whole different story. There is subjectivity here because . . . taxes are complex.

  • JackU

    I’m not sure how Gov. Palin becomes an effective spokesperson for Autism. I thought her son has Downs Syndrome. While both are classified as developmental disabilities they aren’t the same. Actual advocates for both groups would most likely not appreciate the confusion.

  • Matt

    Thanks for blog Bob. It was interesting!

  • Gayle K

    We are 29th in the world inour health standards and results of care given, we have to have the interest of the “people” not the corporations and insurance lobby profits as the means test, so someone in Canada has to wait 3 months for an MRI, well, I couldn’t get “aproved for one at all!”

  • carl

    am i the only one that remembers the Keating 5 in the savings and loan crisis? where has this been durring the entire campaign if it is to be an open season on the associtions of the candidates?

  • Ryan

    Barack Obama did well; he was calm, on topic, and looked presidential. John McCain was rigid and appeared irritated. Also, I think Obama explained his policies well.

  • Kathleen

    To Megan: I also noticed two references to autism. At first I thought McCain was referring to the needed funding for research because autism is drawing a lot of attention, but the second reference clearly linked Palin. As a special ed. teacher and a parent of an autistic child, I wondered how he could confuse the two?

  • Megan

    I wonder if McCain’s confusion over autism vs. Down’s stems from the fact that he comes from a generation for whom that distinction didn’t exist (or at least mattered very little). I also work with special needs children and find that many of their grandparents and others in their lives who are McCain’s age don’t understand the differences between various developmental disorders. For me, personally, education and health care are important electoral issues, and McCain’s mistake (or slip, or misstatement, or whatever you want to call it), demonstrates that he doesn’t have the depth of understanding of the health and educational issues that will face our country in the future that I would expect of a leader.

  • Lily

    It doesn’t appear that McCain understands what autism is–nothing at all related to Down’s Syndrome, except that both are developmental disabilities.

  • LK

    This might clarify the questions about what McCain intended when he referenced autism:

    Palin’s sister has a child who has autism. As we all know, Palin herself has a child who has Down syndrome.

    With the rising prevalence of autism (at least 1 in 150 births, perhaps even greater), it’s probably more strategic for McCain to call out that disorder rather than Down syndrome (about 1 in 800 births).

  • brian

    It seems that he might have been better off not talking about either Downs or Autism, since now a bunch of people think he doesn’t know the difference.