Unless you believe the meteorologists at the National Weather Service weren’t doing the best they could tracking a significant storm heading in our direction over the last week, they owe us nothing else.

This afternoon, however, the local office provided this explanation to satisfy the absurd social media criticism from the metro because the storm ended up farther south.

The Internet picked an odd time to suddenly demand 100% accuracy.

Don’s Towing and Repair Facebook page

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Jim Stingl takes a deep dive — sorry — into the No. 1 growth business in Wisconsin (and we, presume, Minnesota): Pulling cars and trucks out of lakes.

And the vehicles seem to be biting thanks to the bait being used: warmer temperatures and drivers who aren’t all that bright at times.

“They get frantic and I’m sure they feel a little bit of stupidity there,” Don Herman, owner of Oshkosh’s Sunk? Dive and Ice Service, told Stingl.

“I always tell them, ‘We’ll get at it. Your vehicle is in the safest place it’s ever been since it was made. Nobody is going to steal it. Wet is wet. Once it’s in, it’s wet and it’s not going to get any wetter,’ ” he said.

A sunken vehicle is nothing more than expensive chum. It’s never going to work again.

It costs $3,000 to $4,000 to pull a car out of the water but it’s covered by insurance. Maybe that’s why people don’t seem to mind taking a chance.

He’ll fish out anything that can sink.

“We pulled out a semi that went off Highway 41. We pulled out a track hoe”, he said. “I pulled out a vehicle one time that had only 17 miles on it. Still had the sticker in the window.”

But Herman says social media is really hurting his business when there’s a bad spot on the lake, people post it on Facebook and, apparently, potential business avoids it.

He should move to Minnesota.

From the archive: Photos: How a pro pulls a pickup out of a lake (NewsCut)

The war on the free press was ratcheted up today when press secretary Sean Spicer moved the daily briefing from the White House briefing room to his office.

In so doing, Spicer barred The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, Politico, and CNN from attending.

Perhaps coincidentally — likely not — they happened to be the organizations who reported that the Trump administration tried to pressure the FBI to downplay connections between Russia and the Trump team. CNN led the reporting on that story.

To their credit, the Associated Press and Time decided to boycott the briefing in support of a free press.

That’s not unusual.

In 2009, reporters rallied around FoxNews when the Obama administration declared that the network “is not a news organization.”

That set up an exchange between then-ABC News reporter Jake Tapper and then White House press secretary Robert Gibbs:

Tapper: It’s escaped none of our notice that the White House has decided in the last few weeks to declare one of our sister organizations “not a news organization” and to tell the rest of us not to treat them like a news organization. Can you explain why it’s appropriate for the White House to decide that a news organization is not one –

(Crosstalk)

Gibbs: Jake, we render, we render an opinion based on some of their coverage and the fairness that, the fairness of that coverage.

Tapper: But that’s a pretty sweeping declaration that they are “not a news organization.” How are they any different from, say –

Gibbs: ABC –

Tapper: ABC. MSNBC. Univision. I mean how are they any different?

Gibbs: You and I should watch sometime around 9 o’clock tonight. Or 5 o’clock this afternoon.

Tapper: I’m not talking about their opinion programming or issues you have with certain reports. I’m talking about saying thousands of individuals who work for a media organization, do not work for a “news organization” — why is that appropriate for the White House to say?

Gibbs: That’s our opinion.

Outside of journalism circles, however, how you felt about the attitude toward the press depended on who you voted for.

Media Matters, for example, was wholly on the White House side on the issue in 2009.

The exchange did not spark a debate about the ability of news organizations to cover the White House, it sparked a debate on whether FoxNews was a “real” news organization.

That fact is why today’s barring of White House reporters from White House information isn’t going to hurt the Trump administration in the least with those Americans the administration values most: the ones who voted for it.

The president’s reaction today to the stories about his administration’s attempt to pressure the FBI — he wants a crackdown on leaks — reveals a truth: The journalists got the story right.

But American don’t handle truths well.