Three times in the last month — first on his own blog, then in Minnpost, and last Sunday in the Star Tribune — former Gov. Arne Carlson has leveled an incendiary charge at his beloved University of Minnesota. He writes that the university is suffering from “administrative bloat and excessive compensation costs. Despite administrators’ efforts to brush aside the importance of these rising costs, it is of vital importance that we deal with them and prevent further harm.”
The notion that the university is spending too much in the front office is not new; Carlson himself cites supporting stories in the Star Tribune, the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post. What’s so eye-popping about these essays (really slightly different versions of one essay) is that it’s Carlson who’s writing them. He’s the governor whose school spirit runs so deep that his official portrait shows him posing in Gopher colors on campus.
It also doesn’t hurt his case that he writes it very effectively, with stunning examples of those rising costs.
“When I came into the governor’s office in 1991, the president of the university made approximately $152,000. I made $112,000 — for a gap of some $40,000,” he writes.
“Today, the governor makes $120,000, and the university president is paid $610,000 — a gap of $490,000.
“The lead attorney for the university makes $295,000. That’s about $180,000 more than Minnesota’s attorney general, $95,000 more than the attorney general of the United States, and over $70,000 more than the chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
“The university president’s chief of staff earns a salary comparable with that of the U.S. secretary of state. The university lobbyist who pleads the school’s case at the State Capitol earns some $60,000 more than the governor.
“Joel Maturi, a fundraiser and part-time teacher, makes $468,000; the president of the United States earns $400,000.”
That last example came up Monday in Carlson’s conversation with Kerri Miller on The Daily Circuit.
“You can’t have a fund-raiser making more than the president of the United States and then come to the taxpayers and say, ‘You’ve got to pay more taxes to afford us,’” Carlson said.
Miller asked: If administrators think that’s what the market will bear, and Maturi is good at his job, why not pay him that amount?
“That’s absolute nonsense, and it won’t bear out under any scrutiny,” Carlson replied. “But that’s not really the point. I think we have to recognize that all of us … are in the business of serving the public, not vice versa. And it’s not just an issue of salaries. It’s an issue also of competent management.” He repeated his call in the op-ed for a management consulting firm to come in and review the university’s management practices.
He also wants to change the appointment process for the Board of Regents, ensuring the selection of regents with the skills to oversee the institution’s management. “This explosion of administrative costs should never, ever have occurred,” Carlson said. “And that reflects directly on the Board of Regents.”
The big losers, he said, are the students who must mortgage their future to get an education.
“In my day, you could work your way through college without any debt. Today, the average student graduates with a debt of approximately $30,000. You get married, that’s a $60,000 debt for a married couple. And that delays their ability to get into the housing market, which has obvious implications for the economy,” he said.
“Can the student afford it? Can the average family in Minnesota afford to send their sons and daughters to the University of Minnesota without coming out on the debt side? That’s what it’s about.”