PoliGraph: lawmaker gets tax claim wrong

On the floor of the Minnesota Senate, Tax Committee Chair Sen. Julianne Ortman, R-Chanhassen, made this prediction about Gov. Mark Dayton’s income tax plan:

“The Senate fiscal staff has prepared an analysis, Madam President,” Ortman said on March 3, 2011. “It’s dated 2/24/11, and it shows that Gov. Dayton’s proposal would actually impose that 10.95 percent on all income earners in the state of Minnesota within 15 years, because the governor doesn’t index the top bracket.”

Ortman’s claim that all Minnesotans would pay higher taxes because Dayton’s plan does not account for inflation is an exaggeration.

The Evidence

Ortman is talking about is “bracket creep” – the movement of taxpayers into higher brackets when their income increases due to inflation.

As Dayton’s plan stands, the new tier would not be indexed for inflation, unlike Minnesota’s current brackets. That means more people would end up paying the higher rate over time.

But the Senate fiscal report Ortman refers to does not support the claim that all Minnesota taxpayers would be affected by the 10.95 percent rate within 15 years. In fact, it doesn’t even project that far. For all taxpayers to be captured by the new rate within the next 15 years would require an explosion in wages or a significant increase in inflation, say tax experts.

“The point is that everybody is going to be affected by this,” Ortman said of her claim. “Yes, it’s theoretical, but it’s there.”

The Verdict

It is highly unlikely all Minnesota taxpayers will be paying Dayton’s proposed top rate in 15 years.

Ortman’s claim does not pass the PoliGraph test.


Senate Fiscal Report: Analysis of Gov. Dayton’s 4th Tier Without Inflation Adjustment, Feb. 24, 2011

MPR News, FAQ: Making sense of Dayton’s budget proposal, by Madeleine Baran, and

Elizabeth Dunbar, February 15, 2011

Minnesota Management and Budget, Minnesota Biennial Budget: FY 2012-2013, accessed March 10, 2011

Supporting documents from Sen. Ortman, March 10, 2011

Interview, Sen. Julianne Ortman, Tax Committee Chair, March 3, 2011

Interview, Mark Haveman, Executive Director, Minnesota Taxpayers Association, March 10, 2011

Interview, Kit Borgman, spokeswoman, Minnesota Department of Revenue, March 9, 2011

Interview, John Spry, Associate Professor, University of St. Thomas, March 10, 2011


The Humphrey School

  • Jamie

    This is unbelievable! I hadn’t heard about this claim before. Republicans will say anything they want, whether true or not. Even after they get blown out of the water by fact-checkers, they’ll often keep on repeating the same lies. And it’s very much intentional and strategic on their part.

    In this case, they know that a lot of people want taxes to be raised on the rich, that it was Dayton’s well-publicized signature issue in the campaign and people voted him into office. So they have to make it sound like people who are not wealthy are going to have to pay taxes under his plan, too.

    And what an extra-bogus lie this one is! She’s saying that someone who now earns $30,000 a year and has normal salary increases over the years will end up being in that top teir in 15 years. Unbelievable.

  • Ralph Crammedin

    Julianne Ortman and her Far Right wrecking crew used a myriad of budget fabrications and distortions to successfully lie their way into office. Why would they change their methods now? The Republican Attack on the Middle Class continues.